Describe the agent. Studio builds it.
Write the behavior you want in plain language; Studio compiles it into a reviewable orchestration graph with the tools, policies, and tests already in place.
Most agent frameworks demand you write the plumbing. Studio inverts the ratio: you describe intent and constraints, and the compiler fills in the orchestration, retries, and tool bindings — leaving you to review and refine instead of typing boilerplate.
From prose to production
- 01
Describe the job
State the agent's purpose, tools it may use, scope it must stay inside, and what 'done' looks like.
- 02
Inspect the generated graph
Studio compiles the description into a visual orchestration graph — every node, tool, and guardrail is inspectable and editable.
- 03
Refine with examples
Add example inputs and expected outputs. Studio turns them into regression tests the agent must keep passing.
Capabilities
Bidirectional editing
Edit the prose or the graph — the other stays in sync. Nothing is locked behind a UI only mode.
Scope inference
Studio infers what tools and data the described behavior needs and warns on over-scope before deploy.
Prompt-to-code fallback
When prose can't express a constraint, drop into typed code. The two layers coexist without ceremony.
Versioned definitions
Agent definitions live in git. PRs, reviews, and rollbacks work like any other code artifact.